Mrakobes wrote:
LOL i barely understand what you speaking about here for one game seven days what does it mean
i played several games in hot-seat
antarcticus takes like 1 hour to finish
medium maps 2-3 hours
large maybe 4-5 hours but all that can be finished during one day
how comes that you can not finish battle in week
and
Here we are speaking about those non-gentlemen players, who may stop playing a particular game, when he sees that he is losing. Thus, formally, the game will not be over, and the player who has deserved the victory will not get it.
First of all, I should OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCE that such behaviour is BAD!
It torpedoes the gamesmanship and fair-play spirit of the online community. As we have mentioned earlier, even if you lose the battle (by surrendering or due to low banalance), you will still get some score points, so that your rank may increase.
And if such behavior (non-finishing losing players) becomes a major problem, the developers will come up with some technical "enforced defeat" solution.
Mrakobes wrote:
i do not like that rule - 300% balance end game
suppose i have 300% but i opponent still has some troops i want to continue and kill them all kill kill kill kill
there shooul be option in multiplayer FINISH THEM OFF
Well, this "kill, kill, kill" spirit is very good in the battles against the A.I.
When speaking about live players, we keep in mind the values of humanity, good will, etc. (you know that stuff).
In fact, Mrakobes, what is your online Alias? I am really longing for an internet battle with you.